En DE FR ES PL
More than 500 added drugs

More than 500 added drugs

Smoothly reached the first "fireproof" figure of 500 added to Reference book of medicines and crossed this line. Of course, if I were doing this adding in automatic mode, ripping off information in directories, I could add much more, but initially set myself the task of creating the widest possible site for the information presented.

 

In addition, automatic directories are guilty of the fact that if an error has crept into one text, then it will be repeatedly duplicated in many directories and this is an incorrect approach. Maybe that's why on these reference books you will not find reviews about medicines (and if you will find, then written by robots), because they are created only for the sake of advertising.

 

For my own product, I answer and my medical education, I want to believe, allows me to do it professionally. Since the information is re-checked as soon as possible by the drug manufacturers, they are now almost all present on the Internet. Some dietary supplements, for example, are generally difficult to find, such a feeling,that manufacturers have something to hide, it is necessary to deduce their offspring into the light.

 

Errors are naturally encountered by everyone, but they are not global. It's better to be mistaken in the number of capsules or tablets on the package, to admit a grammatical mistake (it's added by a person, not a robot-automatic machine) than to write that the drug is approved for use in pregnant women, although in fact it is not. So the division into global and local mistakes also exists, the good thing for visitors is to like an unbiased submission of material on the site and they believe me that is reflected in their help in finding errors and adding reviews that I publish even if there is criticism in the text in relation to this or that drug and I will continue to do so. After all, I did not create a publicity sweeper, but a site for people who want to find objective information about the product, rather than replicating delusions, than many directories are guilty of.

 

So there are benchmarks, achievements too - I will move on and see what will come of it all. Thank you for being with me!
Reviews (2):
Visitors
Assel
Good evening! Often in the official annotations of drugs, the use in children and pregnant women is not indicated. Can I rely on the reliability of the information? Can you specify additional links that you can rely on? In particular, I'm interested in neurological drugs.
Administrators
admin
AsselIf the use of children and pregnant women in the instruction is not indicated, then most likely, it is simply not enough clinical studies and experience of using the drug in these groups of patients. Therefore, any prescription of drugs in these cases comes from despair (when there are no adequate analogs, and treatment is necessary), either at one's own risk or risk and participate in experiments with yourself and your loved ones with probability. So read the instructions, compare with the opinion of the doctor, you can consult with other specialists if doubts about the adequacy and professionalism of the treating doctor have crept in, everything here is only on trust.

And about the reliability - I can only answer for the information that I missed through myself and published in my Handbook.Sometimes there are delays in updating instructions (this is not the main type of work), but health-threatening changes are introduced as soon as official updates come.

Rules for publishing reviews and visitor questions